Dear Chief Constable Olivia Pinkney
RE: COMPLAINT AGAINST ROGER TRENCHER (FORCE SOLICITOR) HAMPSHIRE POLICE STANDARDS, IOPC, COVERING UP CHILD ABUSE COMMITTED BY THE AUTHORITIES
I enclose a letter of complaint written to you on the 17th November
Read Letter sent dated 17th Nov
to which Roger Trencher replied to me on the 21st November informing me that he would come back to me shortly. As you know this is the second time now Roger Trencher has still not come back to me because he is covering up child abuse committed by Hampshire Police.
Because of the refusal of Police Standards to admit at the very least to being in comtempt of court, I place the full responsibility of this matter on your shoulders.
The crux of my problem in this matter is that my right as a parent to make an application of comtempt of court to the courts to seek Justice for my family against Hampshire Police and Portsmouth CPS has been wrongly denied by the Justice’s Clerk of Hampshire and South Devon also the PCA, IOPC, Sarah Wollaston MP and also covered up by Government, this Government and the New Labour Government of 2001, since 2003, when I found out that the police and CPS had been using family court document without permission of the court or revealing me the evidence.
Smoking Gun Evidence
The PCA Report proves that my Ex-Partner, Hampshire Police, Portsmouth CPS were in comtempt of court on a number of accounts for using a court welfare report as evidence to support the false history contained in my ex-partner harassment statement without permission of the court or Police or CPS revealing the evidence to me. The PCA report is also in comtempt of court because it writes about my family court case without permission of the court and it also makes a false claim that I lost an Appeal in the matter which is untrue, I was not allowed to Appeal.
PCA Report proves Contempt of Court and PCA Cover-up
The right way to resolve this matter
I have also written to my MP asking him and the government to also report this serious family court security breach to Sir Andrew McFarlane.
My legal premise on this matter is:
That Police, MP’s and Minsters of the government were given the privilege to view family court documents around 2005 by Harriet Harman and her government, therefore because of this you are also bound by the rules of the family court and so any breaches of family court rules and in this case it is family court security must be reported back by you or the government to the family court NOT COVERED UP AS HAMPSHIRE POLICE AND GOVERNMENT AND ITS MPS AND MINISTERS HAVE DONE SO IN THE PAST.
If you go to https://www.smoking-caterpillar.com it at this moment in time outlines the history of how , why what happened to my children.
Your sincerely
Paul Summerfield
Cc
Anthony Mangnall MP
17th November 2019
Dear Chief Constable Olivia Pinkney
RE: CHILD ABUSE/ABUSE OF POWER / PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE COMMMITED BY DAN CLACHER HEAD OF PORTSMOUTH POLICE AND DAVID CONNOR HEAD OF PORTSMOUTH CPS AND OTHER IN POWER OF AUTHORITY 2001
I am writing to inform you that my publishing company Smoking Caterpillar is about to name you in attempting to cover up for your working colleagues in the past who abused their power and positions in by committing child abuse of my children.
The Abuse of Power on my Family
In order to convict me of harassment for writing lawful letters Hampshire police told my two children my daughter aged 15 years old and step-daughter aged 17 years old that I was convicted for domestic violence against their mother in the family courts. The two officers then coached my two children to write a false statement claiming that I had lived at the household for 13 years and describe in this statement a arrest by the police for domestic violence against their mother.
The two Police officers knew at the time of the writing of this statement by the girls that their claims were untrue because the girls mother had given the police unlawfully (comtempt of court) a court welfare report without permission of the court. Now if domestic violence had happened at anytime in the household it would have been in the welfare report and its not in there, so this proves that the police officers at the time the statements were written by the girls knew the history contained it the statement were nothing more than lies.
Also the court welfare report incorrectly claimed that I had only lived at the household for eight months and so the police coached the girls mother to write another false history about me to follow the history in the court welfare report which claimed I had only lived at the household for eight months and since that date the children never wanted contact with me. The court welfare was used as evidence to support my ex-partners statement by police and cps without permission of the court or revealing the evidence to me.
As Chief Constable do you seen anything unlawful being done here in order to convict a father for harassment for writing lawful letters to his family by the police and CPS?
Hampshire Police Standards are refusing to investigate this matter of child abuse in order to cover up for Head of Portsmouth Police Dan Clacher and David Connor Head of Portsmouth CPS 2001 part in this.
I am now placing all responsibility on your head for this decision of police standards refusal to investigate.
I am giving you one week to reverse the decision made by Hampshire Police Standards not to investigate and I request an apology for the unlawful criminal manner and abuse of power that befell upon my family in 2001.
If you don’t do this Smoking Caterpillar will publish naming you among many others for attempting to cover this matter up.
Yours sincerely
Paul Summerfield
The Common Law of England requires trials of actions to be conducted in Open Court. But under arcane statutory powers deriving from an Act of 1852, Rule Committees have made rules of court which make secret justice the norm in Family law. That was a decision of a privileged cabal of judges and lawyers and not debated or voted upon by Parliament.
Article 10(1) guarantees the right to freedom of expression, including the right to receive and impart information without interference by public authority. This must include the right of public access to the courts.
The need for Open Justice received support from the English Judiciary in May 1987, when Mrs. Justice Booth complained about the rules of court which excluded the press and public, on the grounds that this was leading to "lax and sloppy advocacy and poor conduct of cases".
Lord Denning , a few years earlier, had publicly stated that:
"Every court should be open to every subject of the Queen. I think it is one of the essentials of justice being done in the community. Every judge, in a sense, is on trial to see that he does his job properly. Reporters are there, representing the public, to see that magistrates and judges behave themselves. Children's courts should also be open. Names should be kept out but the public should know what happens to the child and proceedings should never be conducted behind closed doors......
Somehow I believe, in the words of Jeremy Bentham, that in the darkness of secrecy all sorts of things can go wrong. And if things are really done in public you can see that the judge does behave himself, the newspapers can comment on it if he misbehaves- it keeps everyone in order".
"It is of first importance that all proceedings should be held in public and this includes the delivery of judgments together with the reasons for them. This is so that everyone who wishes to do so can come into court and hear what takes place; and also that the reported cases can be taken down by reporters for their own use." (Edmund Heward, Lord Denning, a Biography, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1990, page 117.)
David Pannick , Fellow of All Souls, Oxford wrote in ‘Judges’ (OUP, 1987) :
"No one who has had any dealings with the law would dispute that the personality and interests of the judge vitally affect the way in which he decides the case, as to style and as to substance. It is a dangerous myth that, merely by putting on a .... robe and taking the oath of office as a judge, a man ceases to be human and strips himself of all predilections, becomes a passionless thinking machine".
"Judicial mavericks will always exist. But the high standards displayed by most judges ensure that the judiciary has little to fear from greater openness and accountability, it has everything to gain in terms of a more widespread understanding and appreciation of its distinction.
The unique virtues of the English judiciary would not be threatened if its members were brought out of the self-imposed seclusion and into the sunlight where their performance could be more effectively assessed. In addition, the greater publicity might reveal some room for improvement in one or two judges. The case for reform of judicial administration does not depend on the merit or demerit of the individual holders of office. Judicial administration is important because judges perform a vital and difficult function of government under the rule of law. Because judges are part of government, acting on our behalf, we are entitled to require them to abandon their priesthood and to present their activities for assessment by laymen. Any aspects of judicial administration which create barriers between the legal system and the community it serves need justification in a democratic society."
Maureen Freely writing in the The Observer about CWO-Probation-officers who masquerade in Britain's SECRET COURTS as experts in matters of child welfare (February 20, 2000):
By training, they are criminal probation officers. When they take on this specialised job, they receive no extra training in child development, and no guidelines about how to interpret such concepts as 'reasonable contact'. Most of the reports they write are based, therefore, on personal conjecture. ...
In the 20 years since the Family Court Welfare Service was founded, there has not been a single follow-up study. The service has never checked its officers' reports for anything except spelling. Because court records are closed to the public, nobody else can check them either. ...
When the nation wondered why it was that so many fathers left home and lost touch with their children within the year, and why it was that about 900 other fathers were driven to kidnap their children every year, they rarely asked how many of those absent and kidnapping parents had been barred by the Family Welfare Service from seeing their children.
To Anthony Mangnall my MP
Dated 19/07/2020
'
Follow the White Rabbit
The PCA report below
Has been written just for you
Because you have more privilege
Then the very likes of just me
But I can float like a butterfly
And sting like a bee
To find your way though
All you need do
Is follow the white rabbit with Court Welfare Report tied on to its back
The white rabbit Sings "I'm Late, I'm Late I'm very very Late"
First to the police it hops
Then to CPS it skips
Then it falls into conners rabbit hole
Where secretly the court welfare report was used as evidence by Connors Court
Then onwards onwards the white rabbit runs
To the house where the PCA Report was written
Where again no permission was given
So they remain unforgiven
So with your privilege you MUST report
This Contemptible foul deed indeed
Not to the King of the Family Court at Hampshire’s Police CID
But to the very President Himself
To the President's Office
Where he sits and rules in the Family Court
The Smoking Caterpillar
Child Abuse & Corruption of Justice in the City of Portsmouth from 2001
... the connor justice gang of portsmouth...
Smoking caterpillar is updating style and text for public consumption
Updating
Who turned his courts into nothing more than a dung heap for his flies to play in
Royal Court of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL
24/7/2020
Vendetta members: David Connor Head of Portsmouth CPS 2001/ Dan Clacher Head of Portsmouth Police 2001/Jacky Floyd (friend of David Connor)/ My Brothers Keith and John and Keith’s wife Liz Summerfield and my cousin Sylvia Jarvis who are all friends of David Connor
Dear Sir or Madam
RE: CHILD ABUSE / COMTEMPT OF COURT /PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE/POLICE, CPS ATTEMPTING TO COVER UP DRUG TAKING AT MY DAUGHTERS HOME AND AN ARSON ATTACK ON THE NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBOUR KEVIN GLENNANE BY JACKY FLOYD FRIEND OF DAVID CONNOR/ABUSE OF POWER
I would like to begin proceedings against Hampshire Police and Portsmouth CPS for using a family court document as evidence and sending on to others without permission of the court and police knowingly lying to my children about their parents family court case and Police Knowingly at the time that that the children’s history contained in the statements were false (police had the court welfare report and there is no history of DV or police arrests of me for DV in the welfare report or on police records)
I enclose a PCA Report and the court welfare report which proves that not only are the police are in comtempt of court but they are knowingly coaching their harassment witnesses to write false histories in their harassment statements and also that the PCA attempted and succeeded in covering this up for the CPS and Police.
Police are in comtempt on two counts sending a court welfare onto Portsmouth CPS then again to the PCA without permission of the court
The CPS on one count of comtempt using this as evidence to support a false history written by the mother of my daughter although James Kellam CPS claims in the report that he sent it back to the mother, this has to be a lie, because police and CPS had no other evidence to support either of the false histories contained in the harassment statements, so according to PACE no evidence THERE CANNOT BE NO COURT CASE.
Police are in comtempt of court/abuse of power and committed child abuse for claiming to my daughter and Stepdaughter that their parent’s family court case in 1999 was that I was convicted for domestic violence against mother then police coached the children to write a false history in a harassment statement ascertaining to the domestic violence and what lead up to the 1999 family court case.
Police are in contempt of court/abuse of power for then also coaching their mother to write a false history that was in the court welfare report that I only lived at the household for eight months and since that time the children never wanted to see me but in this statement there are no claims of domestic violence because the statement was following the incorrect history in the court welfare report.
Police and CPS have also later covered up drug use at my daughters’ home with other children and the drugs were being supplied by Jacky Floyd.
It only began to end with an arson attack by Jacky Floyd on the next-door neighbour Kevin Glennane and his family
It finally ended just after the arson attack by Floyd when the mother nearly died from a drink drug overdoes that left her not with a hangover but permanent brain damage.
Police CPS, Solicitors, Courts and Government covered up everything up again for Connor and Floyd
All charges of arson were dropped for Floyd and so Kevin Glennane and his family were forced to move home in case Floyd would do this again. I was also blocked by two area Justice’s clerks since 2002 for making court applications in this matter Jonathan Black for Hampshire and Tim Smith for South Devon. Justice Minister Harriet Harman also refused to pass onto the family courts information about the breaches of family court security.
The above is the reason why this matter has taken so long to get to court and to insure that this matter does go to court I have just like the police and CPS used the court welfare report by publishing the report on my website without permission of the court
This will finally guarantee there will be a hearing in this matter and cannot be covered up anymore.
I suggest to the court that the best way to go about these proceedings to sort this matter very simply although rather late in the day is to invite Hampshire Police to ask permission of the court to use my family court documents as evidence and pass the court documents onto the PCA.
This would be an Open Court Session for Hampshire Police Force solicitor Roger Trencher to ask this permission the Court to use my family court document as evidence (the court welfare report) and use two false different scenarios in harassment statements of what lead up to my 1999 Family court case, so that I could be convicted of harassment for writing a lawful letter about magic and the books I used to read to my daughter and visiting my daughters home with flowers as he still claims what the Police and CPS did was lawful and my letters and visit with flowers was unlawful.
Then if the court agrees with me that the police are in comtempt of court and they have perverted the course of Justice and committed child abuse I would like the court to order Hampshire Police to investigate the drug use and the arson attack on the next door neighbour by Jacky Floyd so she can finally be brought to Justice.
I will be happy to submit a statement with evidence to this court after viewing Hampshire Police Statement, Evidence and Defence to CHILD ABUSE / COMTEMPT OF COURT /PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE/POLICE, CPS ATTEMPTING TO COVER UP DRUG TAKING AT MY DAUGHTERS HOME AND AN ARSON ATTACK ON THE NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBOUR KEVIN GLENNANE BY JACKY FLOYD FRIEND OF DAVID CONNOR/ABUSE OF POWER
Yours sincerely
Paul Summerfield
Enc view Court welfare report
also letter claiming they untrained to deal with child abuse
Cc Head Office of the Family Court
Roger Trencher Force Solicitor
Hampshire Police Constabulary
Leigh Road
Eastleigh
Hampshire
SO50 9SJ
5th July 2020
Dear Roger
RE: BREACH OF FAMILY COURT SECURITY /CHILD ABUSE/PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE/ ABUSE OF POWER/DRUG ABUSE AND ARSON ATTACK COVER-UP POLICE COVER-UP
If you go to the smoking caterpillar site which is just about to be updated you will see this letter and in this letter I am giving the police notice that I am about to write to the Royal Court of Justice in London about the matter of Police coaching my children and their mother to write not one but two false histories about me in their harassment statement and police using a court welfare report of a 1999 family court case without permission of the court or Hampshire Police and Portsmouth CPS forgetting to reveal this evidence to me during the harassment proceedings.
Now being a fair man, all evidence and statements I make to the court will be revealed to Hampshire Police on my site, except the harassment statements because there is little point in showing what the two perverted police officers coached my children and their mother to write about me so that I could be convicted for harassment for writing to my daughter a lawful letter and sending my love to her.
As you know because I have not sought permission of the court to use my daughters court welfare report or write about my 1999 family court case in public, it could be said that I am indeed in contempt of court which in turn guarantees that this matter cannot be covered up anymore it will now finally go to court.
I am going to suggest to the Royal Court of Justice for simplicity that the best place to start this is at the very beginning which is something the police and cps forgot to do and that is ask the court for permission to use my family court documents as evidence.
So the case starts with yourself asking the Royal Court of Justice on behalf of Hampshire Police and Portsmouth CPS permission of the court to use my court welfare report as evidence against me to support just one of the harassment statements made by the children mothers.
The Judge will examine the court welfare report and examine the three harassment statements and my letters that Hampshire Police and Portsmouth CPS deem unlawful, but they are in fact lawful.
The Judge on reading the court welfare report and the harassment statements asks. “Why are you using three harassments statements on this father when only one follows the history of the court welfare report that he lived with his children for eight months, while the other two statements claim that he lived at the household for 13 years and he constantly beat up their mother all throughout the 13 years he lived with them and he was finally arrested and convicted for domestic violence and since that time his children never wanted contact with him”. The Judge thinks about this more then says. “If domestic violence happened in this household the history of it would be in the court welfare report and the police would also have the details on their own records.”
Now that Roger is a tricky question for you to answer, but as I say I am a fair man and I don’t want to get you into any trouble so I thought about it for a long while and this is the answer I have come up for you is:
Quantum entanglement in time travelThe theory is there is not just one world we live in but many with the same people in it, but they are living in a different time.
So you could tell the Judge in answer to his question I am the father in this world that lived with his children for eight months where no domestic violence occurred it was just that his children sadly never wanted to see him, but the other Summerfield in another world that lived with his children for 13 years was a real bastard and the bugger was always drunk and beating the daylights of the children’s mother, unfortunately your honor, we can’t get the court welfare report or get Hampshire Police records in the other parallel world caught in this time quantum entanglement of ours.
The Judge could reply “Oh that alright Mr Trencher, don’t worry the Royal Court of Justice just happens to have a time portal in it cellars next door to the prison cells, I just go down and step into our time portal so I can have a word with myself in the other world to see how I am dealing with the other Summerfield who lived at the household for 13 years same time and I will bring back the court welfare report with the police records of the domestic violence and police arrest and family court case in this time quantum entanglement problem that we have in court today .”
Or he may just turn around to you and say Permission Refused and you’re in Contempt of Court and Police have committed grave child abuse so as to pervert the course of Justice to a father who was trying to protect his children and their mother!
Best of Luck on the quantum entanglement defense.
Yours sincerely
Paul Summerfield
In Memory of Carl Sargeant who was a Welsh politician and the Cabinet Secretary for Communities and Children who committed suicide over claims and leaks of sexual harassment
17/7/2020
Dear Mr Anthony Mangnall
RE: GOVERNMENT COVER UP OF THE UNLAWFUL USE OF THE HARRASMENT ACT BEING COMMITTED BY THE AUTHORITIES AND COVERED UP BY GOVERMENTS
Nina your secretary has seen the evidence and my last MP Sarah Woolaston stupidly attempted three times to intimidate me by claiming to police criminal harassment in this matter while I was making a complaint to the IOPC. Police could not give me the harassment warning or CPS take me to court under my MP’s trumped up charges of harassment because my complaint to her is legitimate very serious and is supported by evidence.
You also on viewing my evidence (PCA Report) in an email I sent refused to help your constituent by telling me to go see a solicitor.
This matter will be going to court.
The Law in this matter
When Sarah Harman pleaded Guilty to comtempt of court for sharing family court documents without permission of the court, her sister Harriet Harman was very upset with Judge Mumby for ruining her sisters life, so the government gave all MP’s & Ministers the privilege to view family court documents.
Being giving the privilege to view family court documents also bounds you by the rules of the family court.
Therefore when being given evidence that police are coaching their harassment witnesses to give false harassment statements (in my case not one but two false histories and police and cps have used a family court document to support one of the false histories without permission of the court. Then it is yours and ministers of the government duty by law to the family court to report back to the family court breaches of family court security as is written in the PCA attached. I sending you again the PCA report the police are in comtempt twice one for sending to the CPS and again to the PCA without permission of the court.
You and the ministers of the government have but two choices in this matter you either pay respect to the rules of the family court and report it to the President of the Family court that Police are coaching there witnesses to lie in harassment statement and are using family court documents without permission of the court as evidence to support one of the false family histories contained in the harassment statements or you can like Sarah Wollaston claim to police harassment.
Your constituent
Paul Summerfield
CcPolice came to my home and told me I could not see my daughter again because I had written her a letter.
Police then visted my daughters home
Police knowingly gave false information to the children that I had been found guilty of domestic violence against their mother in the 1999 family court case in order to alienate me from my children and police then told the children if I tried to contact them to call the police and I would be arrested
But it did not end there as police and Connor expected because I broke out of concern the police harrasment warning, which forsed a court case
Police then coached children to write a false history about what the police had told the children, the children claimed I had lived with them at the household for 13years and ended with a police arrest for domestic violence, none of this is true, I lived at the household for seven years then left the household and had another seven years contact with the children. The court welfare report does prove that the police and cps knew the children had been coached to write this false statement because the court welfare report contains no history of domestic violence and incorrectly claims I only lived at the household for eight months
Police then coached the children’s mother to write yet another completely false history but this time with no domestic violence and police arrests in her statement claiming that I only lived at the household for eight months this false history exactly related to 1999 family court welfare report, so we have not one, but two false scenarios of the 1999 family court case written in the harassment statements
Police and CPS then used the court welfare report as evidence without permission of the court to support the mothers false history so that a court case could begin. James Kellam, Connors right hand man at the CPS, claims in the PCA report that was not the case, but it was, it must have been, because the police and CPS had no other evidence to support either history,no evidence no court case according to PACE. Kellam also lies in the PCA report by claiming that their was an appeal to the case which I lost, that is also untrue, I was refused an appeal at Conners Court, so that the case could be covered up
Barrington- Clarke my defence solicitor acted like ‘defence for the prosecution’ he did not do what I instructed him to do which was get the case closed down because of no evidence. He did not do that he just shouted and swore at me on the day of the trial to change my plea to guilty
EvidenceDuring the harassment proceedings Dan Clacher (head of Portsmouth police) covers up by claiming to my MP Syd Rapson that he looked at all the evidence and he assured him that his officers have acted professionally and lawfully.
After this Police and CPS covered up drug abuse at my children’s home and an arson attack by Jacky Floyd (Friend of Connor) on Kevin Glennane the next-door neighbour and Floyd said to police she did it because she was coming off the heroin
Because also just after the arson attack on the next door neighbour the childrens mother was left with brain damage due to a drug overdose, this was all covered up by police and my two brothers John and Keith and his wife Liz Summerfield (unknown to me at the time they were friends with David Connor), solictors, courts and government
Police and CPS covered up again by refusing to press charges of arson against Floyd for the arson attack, even though she admitted arson to the police and so Kevin Glennane the next-door neighbour and his family were forsed to move home, out of fear that Floyd would again attempt to burn his home down again while they were asleep
It was a child abuse case, my daughter was being emotionally and mentally abused by David Connors friend Jacky Floyd, it is pretty clear now that David Connor placed undue pressure on the court welfare service, based on what is in the court welfare report, to cover up Floyd’s abuses in the court welfare report which the court did order the court welfare service to investigate, outside court the court welfare service refused to invesigate or interview the children about Floyds abuse on the grounds they were untrained to do so. My daughters mother made no allegations of DV or police arrests in her statements to the court because it never happened so no orders were made against me to stop me from seeing my children
When I found out from the next door neighbour Kevin Glennane about the drug use, arson attack on his family by Floyd and the children’s mother near death from a drug overdose which left her with brain damage I did two things:
I made an application to the court to take the Chief Constable to court over all of this.
My MP sent all the evidence to Minister of Justice Harriet Harman, both parties covered-up breaches of family court security
The area clerk to the Justice’s wrote back to me blocking my application and he disregarded everything what happened to my family and claims in the letter that police using family court documents without permission of the court is a minor offence, tell that to Mark Harris who was imprisoned for eight months twice for waving to his children. Note also in the letter he does not mention Police sent the court Welfare report also to the PCA without permission
Justice's Clerk Black letter to cover up
After this I made a complaint to my MP and wrote a statement out with evidence and this was sent to Harriet Harman who was then Minister of Justice and she and her sister personally knew all about the comtempt rules of sharing family court documents as they had their hands slapped by Judge Mumby for breaching court security.
Again Harman Minister for Justice cover-up and writes back claiming nothing is wrong go see a solicitor
Minister of Justice Cover letter
The first thing to note is what is on the front the court welfare report, that the court welfare report is not to be copied or sent onto anyone else except the privileged few, but even though barristers, solicitors are privileged they are not also allowed to use the documents for anything else but a family court case unless they get permission from the family court to do so.
Note also that even the children of the court case are not to be told what their parents court case was about and all this is because the law is to protect children from harm.
Now look to the the court welfare report check list
There should be seven important points that the court welfare officer should of investigated but in my report there are only three checks ticked.
And the most important one that she refused to investigate was this:
This was a child abuse not a domestic violence case and the case was about Jacky Floyd’s abusing my children and drugs being used at my daughter’s home and this is what the dispute in the court welfare report was about but Pam Phillips refused to discuss it or question the children about it because she was untrained to do so. As you can see at the end of the court welfare report is a letter from Pam Merritt manageress of the court welfare service who claims they cannot carry out this risk assessment to children because they are untrained to do so, yet their own court welfare check list says they must do so.
All appointments were cancelled and the court welfare service refused to have a discussion about the abuses that were occurring at my daughter’s home concerning David Connors friends Jacky Floyd between myself my daughters mother with the court welfare officer Pam Phillips.
What was contained in my statement was that both children were being abused by Jacky Floyd for using drugs and began the alienation of my children to get rid of me.
The Fact is after the court case, Mum when back to her children and told them a lie she told them that she had won a domestic violence against me
This allowed Floyd back into the home because the children thought now that Floyd had been telling the truth to my daugher about me
And we all know what happened after that don't we Hampshire Police?
Children willing to lie about me in court statments because they were told it was true
Drugs being used at the home by Floyd with school children
Arson attack by Floyd on the next door neighbour Kevin Glennane and his family
Mothers overdose of drugs which left her with brain damage for the rest of her life
All of my daughters suffering and her mothers brain damage could have been avoided if the court welfare service did back in 1999 what it was supposed to do which is protect children not Jacky Floyd and also Hampshire Police committing child abuse at a later date by allowing their harassment witnesses to write false histories about me in harrasment statements and using evidence of a court welfare report to support one of the false histories so that I could be convicted of harassment for lawful acts of a father
It all began with this letter I wrote one day to my daughter
that lead me down his Lord of the Flies rabbit hole
falling to a place
where love is hate and hate is love
where evil is good and good is evil
where a truth is a lie and a lie is a truth
where law is no law and no law is law
A place where love, letters, books and poems
Have now all just become just a crime
In the eyes of his majesty
David Connor
The Lord of the Flies
I have had as I’m sure you equally so have had enough of this silly sad nonsense……….
Being an inpatient sort of person and father to you, I decided yesterday that I am going to have to take a severe approach, dangerous and drastic to put a stop to this intolerable situation, so I have turned to the sterner art of magic.
Yesterday I went to the toy shop you know the one near the magic theatre and brought myself a wizards costume complete with pointed hat that has magic symbols on it, robe and most important of all the magic wand. I also brought a set of enchanted pens and supernatural paper because the old Chinese man who was the manager of the toy shop told me in mandarin (a language I speak fluently) that he had sold out of magic spell books as they are in such high demand.
I may wear my wizard’s suit when we meet that is of course if you still want to see me. It hangs in my wardrobe. I’ve also been wondering about that wardrobe and may later take a look around inside as you never quite know where these things can lead!
Anyway back to my little story, when I got home I was a little at first lost with what to do. I mean I had spent a lot of money on this magic gear but in all reality it was just a flight of fancy because I have no spell book. Then suddenly I had an idea maybe I could use that little poem as a spell you know the one I wrote the other day about you with my crayons in a day dream.
So last night at the hour of midnight standing on only one leg, wearing my pointed hat, robe and trusty magic wand by my side, I began to copy out my spell to you my daughter using the set of enchanted pens and supernatural paper I had brought from the toy shop.
This is what I wove so please read it carefully as I’ve added for you something very magically special at the very end of it.
The Smoking Caterpillar
I was talking to the smoking caterpillar the other day
When much to my amazement the caterpillar changed into the most brightest the most colourful the most beautiful butterfly I ever did see
The butterfly rose up fluttering wonderful golden wings across my room
Out though my window into the black night
When I heard it sing
Here or there or anywhere
Wherever you may be
Everywhere with you
I will always be
I wrote this one especially for you
While thinking about all the times and all those nights when I read you magic stories
While talking to the smoking caterpillar
While writing to Holly or Lou or Alice in Wonderland
All my deepest love To You
My Darling Daughter
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
from
and
click below to see and hear the trial instigated by David Connor The Lord of the flies
And Leader of the Portsmouth Connor Justice Gang
THE TRIALTo criminalise this father for writing a letter about reading books to his daughter writing to her that he loves her, then police inciting hatred to his children by telling them both lies about their parents family court case, then police coaching his children and their mother to write not one but TWO false histories about me in police statements so that the police and cps can then incriminate a father for writing a letter to his daugher about books and love, just goes too far, to somewhere where you have all lost yourselves in.....
..........somewhere………at……the ......time of.....….1984... ...in the book of:
The Lord of the Flies
Dear Mr Anthony Mangnall
RE: HAMPSHIRE POLICE AND PORTSMOUTH CPS HEAD-FUCKING MY CHILDREN AND POLICE AND CPS FUCKING AROUND WITH MY FAMILY COURT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COURT OR REVEALING THE EVIDENCE TO ME
As you can read, I decided to write in the common man approach in order for you to understand that this situation will no longer be covered up by courts and government and its ministers.
Now is the time for your government and the courts to take this seriously instead of covering up the child abuse of my children committed or instigated by Dan Clacher of head of Portsmouth Police and David Connor Head of Portsmouth CPS.
It’s not only me, we do not know how many parents have lost contact with their children because of unlawful police harassment warning to keep parents away from their children. But since then the harassment law has matured, we see political vendettas being used on politicians Carl Sargeant (Cabinet Secretary for Communities and Children) for example, over just a leak to attempt to destroy his reputation, but sadly for him and his family it did more than that because he committed suicide and I can quite understand why having been though the confusion of it all myself.
Alex Salmond is another one but he decided to fight on instead of giving up………. My case has also been covered up by Courts, the last three governments the conservative party and my last MP Sarah Wollaston.
Now as far as I see in the eyes of the law in my case, you are all just a bunch of child perverts protecting child perverts within the judicial system.
You and the ministers of the government were given the privilege by Sarah and Harriet Harman therefore it is yours and the government duty to report back any security breaches to the head of the family court because the rules are in place to protect children and their parents from child perverts such as in my case persons in Hampshire Police Force and Portsmouth CPS. As far as I am concerned you my MP Mr Mangnall, in your privilege position, by turning your back on me and the law are nothing more then a child pervert if you do not personally report the comtempt of court to the head of the family court Sir Andrew McFarlane, because he is the only person that can sort this out, between the Government and the Criminal Courts.
All he has to do is decide if Barrister Sarah Harman and former Minister of Justice Harriet Harman are correct that Judge Mumby was wrong to ruin Sarah Harman’s life when in punishing her for using family court documents without permission of the court or if Judge Mumby is correct in his interpretation of the law that it does not matter what privilege you have if you use family court documents without permission of the court you will be severely punished because you are breaching family court security which is in place to protect children and parents.
So the choice is yours and the government who you go with on the interpretation of just breaching family court security Barrister Sarah Harman and once Minister of Justice Harriet Harman, that it is a minor offence for someone who has the privilege or Judge Mumby that it does not matter who you are you will be punished severely.
Because quite frankly child pervert Dan Clacher Head of Portsmouth Police 2001 and his pervert buddy David Connor Head of Portsmouth CPS 2001 need to be locked up in an asylum for what they did to my family.
I paid my price for writing a letter about books to my daughter £100 fine with no restraining order, now it’s time for Hampshire Police and the CPS to pay their dues to what the child perverts had to do to prosecute me for writing that lawful letter about magic in books to my daughter.
This is an open letter and I am sending a copy to Devon Police Standards because I am sick to death of MP’s attempting to use the harassment act on me and sending Devon Police to my home in order to intimidate me, so Devon Police can check out my site (because they too have been given the privilege to view family court documents) which has just a small amount of evidence on it so that they can make their own legal decision on this as to who’s interpretation of the law is correct Harman or Mumby.
I will retract from calling you a child pervert if you do as I ask by following the law and informing for the government to Sir Andrew McFarlane that Police, CPS have breached family court security and the courts and the past governments have attempted and suckseeded to cover my case up until now.
Yours sincerely
aul Summerfield
Pcc
Professional.Standards@devonandcornwall.pnn.police.uk
Dear Devon & Cornwall Police Standards
POLICE AND MP INTIMIDATION USING THE HARRASMENT ACT
Please regard this as a complaint, but not about the way your officers have acted towards me at all when three times two years ago my MP Sarah Wollaston made a complaint of criminal harassment to the police about me, when I was in fact making a complaint to the IOPC about child abuse which concerns Hampshire Police and Portsmouth CPS acting in a most unlawful perverted way towards me and my family.
The first time Sarah Wollaston made a criminal complaint about me to the police, Brixham Police sent two women officers to my home, but the officers were clearly puzzled as to why they had been ordered to go my home, they had been ordered not give me a harassment warning but to warn me that if I complain about this anymore I would be given a harassment warning.
I want to make this noticeably clear I am not making any complaint about any of your officers who visited my home during this period, they all acted kindly and professionally towards me.
However I am at risk again of another criminal harassment complaint from our new MP Mr Anthony Mangnal on receiving the evidence he refused to see me or act on my behalf or treat this child abuse case seriously and so I think he is trying to cover this up.
Details of my complaint with a little evidence on it which proves my points are on my website http://www.smoking-caterpillar.com
As you can see I have purposely made it outrageous so if I am lying or incorrect about the laws I could be easily arrested by the police and sent to prison.
I don’t know if Devon Police will agree with me or family law, but I think the only way out of this is for Devon Police to contact Sir Andrew McFarlane Head of the Family Court asking him for direction for Devon Police on this matter because he is the only person that can come between Government and Police to sort this matter out and the basis of the law is as I wrote in my letter to my MP who is right in interpretation of the family courts comtempt of court laws, is it Sarah and Harriet Harman or Judge Mumby? The same recourse of law applies of course to Hampshire Police Standards, my MP and his Government.
Yours sincerely
Paul Summerfield
Sir Andrew McFarlane
President of the family Division
Royal Court of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL
8th July 2020
Open Letter
Dear Sir Andrew McFarlane
RE: COMTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HAMPSHIRE POLICE AND PORTSMOUTH CPS AT THE ROYAL COURT OF JUSTICE
I wrote to you about this on the 14th January 2019 when Independent Office for Police Conduct was investigating my complaint about this and I sent you the evidence of police coaching my family to write two false scenarios of a family court case and police and cps used a court welfare report to support one of the false histories without permission of the court or revealing to me the evidence during the harassment proceedings all because I wrote a lawful letter about the joys of reading books and the art of magic to my daughter.
I have now written to the Royal Court of Justice to begin comtempt of court proceedings against Hampshire Police and Portsmouth CPS to finally sort out this unlawful nonsense that the police and CPS among others have against the joys reading of books to my daughter in a letter.
The reason why this has not got into court is there seems to be some debate to one of the laws that the police and cps broke in order to incriminate me for writing a letter about the magic of books to my daughter.
FAMILY COURT SECURITY
The protection of Children and Parents
FAMILY COURT SECURITY BREACHES
RULE 23 (1) FAMILY PROCEEDINGS COURTS (CHILDREN’S ACT 1989) RULES 1991
Its to do with when Sarah Harman pleaded guilty to comtempt of court for sharing family court documents with the government without permission of the court.
There seems to be two roads of thoughts of law on this
I personally thought that Judge Mumby was very lenient with Sarah Harman considering Ms Harman was a barrister and knew all she needed to do was ask permission of the court and state her reason why she thought it necessary to share family court documents with the government.
However Sarah Harman treated Judge Munby’s punishment for her breach of family court security with comtempt, for she complained to the press after Judge Munby’s punishment complaining that it was all so unnecessary and Judge Mumby had now ruined her life…….Forgetting as a barrister whilst complaining that all she needed to do was to ask permission to the court before she did it!
So, from my experience their seems to be two roads of thought on those with privilege, breaching family court rules and its security.
Now during this 21-year journey of mine I have found that everybody with privilege agrees with Sarah Harman that Judge Mumby was just an old out of time fuddy-duddy.
In my case two justices clerks Jonathan Black for Hampshire and Tim Smith for South Devon have blocked all my application to the courts, Mister of Justice Harriet Harman covered up for Police and CPS by refusing to do anything about the comtempt, my MP Sarah Wollaston and her government have found the law laughable by not again reporting the breaches back to the head office of the family court and the IOPC refused to do anything about it, the list goes on and on ……….
I have written to the Royal Court of Justice to test this law out to see who is correct Judge Mumby or Barrister Sarah Harman and her sister Harriet Harman.
I have suggested although rather late in the day, that the court invites Hampshire Police to ask permission to use my family court documents in my harassment case and bring all the evidence they have against me, Harassment Statements, the letters, and the court welfare report to ask the court permission to use this for a harassment court case and then after sending the court welfare report onto the PCA without permission of the court also they are in comtempt of court and perverted the course of justice because they coached there harassment witnesses to write not one but two different false scenarios of what lead up to the 1999 family court case .
Hampshire Police can pay the costs for this as it was something the Police and CPS should have done, but forgot to do during the harassment proceedings as well as revealing to me that they were using the court welfare report as evidence to support just one of the false histories about me contained in the harassment statements.
If the court agrees with Hampshire Police and Sarah Harman that this law is out of date and the privileged can do just what they like with family court documents, then the Royal Court of Justice can stick me in prison for eight months, because to guarantee that there will be some sort of court case over this, I have been forced to put up without permission of the court the offending court welfare report on view so as to guarantee that finally their will be hearing in this matter.
The smoking caterpillar is not only angry about the law being breached here and harassment witness being coached to lie so that I could be convicted of lawful acts, but also books and music are deemed criminal by Police, CPS, Government and Courts as being not the thing to teach are children to do.
When the truth is books and music help you to perceive the world you live in, True Art is but a mirror of our own reality we have yet to perceive.
The books that come the closest I know of to what happened to my family are 1984 and the lord of the flies (what can happen to a family when the law does not matter anymore because David Connor did fix it for his friend Jacky Floyd.
Yours sincerely
Paul Summerfield
Enc
Letter to you dated 14th January 2019
Royal Court of Justice letter to bring proceedings dated 24/7/2020
So what book gives the reasons as to why my brothers John and Keith
did this
to support their friend child pervert David Connor and the two false histories written in the harassment statements
which at the time they thought was so funny?
The answer is in the book that every child has read…
The book is called Cinderella
Just reverse the Gender and you are there to remind you that it is called
is but another
And the wicked witch was not the mother
For the girls mother a school librarian
Although she did wrong was just another victim
From the drug and fire raiser Witch Floyd and her friend Connor, The Lord of the Flies
That Hampshire Police know of and cover this secret ring
For inside this dark inner circle was Clacher, Connor and his friends, Floyd, my two brothers and my cousin Sylvia Jarvis
David Connor Head of Portsmouth CPS 2001
Portsmouth Answer to Jim will Fix it